100 things Wiki
Edit Page

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
''Modularity of Mind'' is the title of both a book by Jerry Fodor and the philosophy of cognitive sciences it bore. Even though I don't think anyone, Fodor included, truly understands the writing in ''Modularity of Mind'', some the big points of the book were rather impactful. Cognition (hold that thought) is conceived as the sum output of a network of functionally independent input / output modules. The modules are strictly defined by their adherence to nine criteria - most importantly that they make fast, frugal, specific outputs, in response to fixed inputs, in a way that can't be inhibited and that we can't introspect. The 'hold that thought' above is because Fodor argued that what cognitive psychologists are studying is necessarily limited to 'what inputs go where' kinds of questions. 'Central cognition', the juicy stuff that is what we purport to study, is forever veiled by the nature of the module architecture. So really we're all wasting our time! Or something.
+
Modularity of Mind is the title of both a book by Jerry Fodor and the philosophy of cognitive sciences it bore. Even though I don't think anyone, Fodor included, truly understands the writing in Modularity of Mind, some the big points of the book were rather impactful. Cognition (hold that thought) is conceived as the sum output of a network of functionally indepenendent input / output modules. The modules are strictly defined by their adherence to nine criteria - most importantly that they make fast, frugal, specific outputs, in response to fixed inputs, in a way that can't be inhibited and that we can't introspect. The 'hold that thought' above is because Fodor argued that what cognitive psychologists are studying is necessarily limited to 'what inputs go where' kinds of questions. 'Central cognition', the juicy stuff that is what we purport to study, is forever veiled by the nature of the module architecture. So really we're all wasting our time! Or something.
   
 
Modularity assumptions were transformative to universal grammar theories, early cognitive neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, certain kinds of formalizations of cognition, and other insurgent parts of our field. 
 
Modularity assumptions were transformative to universal grammar theories, early cognitive neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, certain kinds of formalizations of cognition, and other insurgent parts of our field. 

Please note that all contributions to the 100 things Wiki are considered to be released under the CC-BY-SA

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)